香港滑雪論壇  
返回   香港滑雪論壇 > 滑雪討論區 > 滑雪教室 > SNOWBOARD 技巧教學

通知
回覆
 
主題工具 顯示模式 Google 翻譯
舊 2010-06-15, 19:41   #1
Mike
超級版主
 
Mike 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-19
住址: HK
文章: 4,358
Mike 正向着好的方向發展
CASI instructor standards

Now you know what to do .....







Mike 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2010-06-15, 22:09   #2
skier
進階會員
 
skier 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-19
住址: Hong Kong
文章: 759
skier 正向着好的方向發展
The problem with these CASI or CSIA demo requirements is that they probably use the same riders or skiers (probably a level 4) for the demonstrations of all levels.

Can you really tell the difference between a level 1 to level 2, from level 2 to level 3, and level 3 to level 4?
skier 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2010-06-16, 02:26   #3
pan
滑雪教練
 
pan 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-22
住址: Canada
文章: 88
pan 是普普通通的會員
酷

作者: skier 查看文章
The problem with these CASI or CSIA demo requirements is that they probably use the same riders or skiers (probably a level 4) for the demonstrations of all levels.
The riders in the standard video are Jeff C., Dave B., Charles G., David G., Jeremy S.. They are all level 4 evaluators. I don't know the rest of the riders, but I suppose they are at least level 3 evaluators. The students in the quick ride system videos are level 3 instructors.

The riding standards in the videos are being used by all the CASI evaluators across Canada. All evaluators should always be able to demo at a given level (aka level 4 evaluator must be able to demo clearly a distinguished level 1-4 riding standard at any given time). Keep in mind, the riding standard will be adjusted according to the terrain and snow condition.

In order to pass the riding standard, there are basic riding requirement in each level. For example, carving in level 2, 360s and moguls in level 3, etc (which are shown in the videos). However, these are just small part of it. Us, the evaluators, we want to see consistency, versatility and adaptability during the course. Higher the level, more the performance we demand. The video is just a preview of what we demand.

I'm not sure if this is same for CSIA, but I believe it's similar.

Lastly, technical skill is only 50% of the CASI and CSIA exam. There are also teaching exam.

作者: skier 查看文章
Can you really tell the difference between a level 1 to level 2, from level 2 to level 3, and level 3 to level 4?
Yes, I can tell the difference between them.

Learn2Ride, Train2Train, Train2Compete, Learn2Win, Train2Win

CASI 高級及指導考官
Snowboard比賽教練
Grouse, Seymour, Cypress, Whistler滑雪學校訓練員
北海道CASI Course統籌
CASI Hokkaido
Coach Pan
pan 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2010-06-16, 21:41   #4
skier
進階會員
 
skier 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-19
住址: Hong Kong
文章: 759
skier 正向着好的方向發展
作者: pan 查看文章

Yes, I can tell the difference between them.

What I meant is that since it is all demo'ed by the level 4 evaluators, so for example, their demo'ing the Level 2 skills is kind of similar to their demo'ing the level 3 skills.

Pan, you are now a CASI level 3, and a level 2 evaluator?
skier 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2010-06-17, 00:12   #5
pan
滑雪教練
 
pan 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-22
住址: Canada
文章: 88
pan 是普普通通的會員
作者: skier 查看文章
Pan, you are now a CASI level 3, and a level 2 evaluator?
Yes, I am.

作者: skier 查看文章
What I meant is that since it is all demo'ed by the level 4 evaluators, so for example, their demo'ing the Level 2 skills is kind of similar to their demo'ing the level 3 skills.
I'm not a level 3/4 evaluator, but I took CASI super course for the last eight years (east and west coast). I've seen so many people took level 3 and 4 courses and exams. There is a huge different between level 2, 3 and 4 candidates.
Each level of evaluators should be able to demo at a require level at any given time. When I'm demo level 2 riding, it will be the riding standard in my level 2 course.
To become level 4 evaluators, not only he or she has to be a great rider and instructor, but also has been giving lot of CASI 1-3 courses. Therefore, a level 4 evaluator should be able to demo better than other levels of evaluators at any given time.

Learn2Ride, Train2Train, Train2Compete, Learn2Win, Train2Win

CASI 高級及指導考官
Snowboard比賽教練
Grouse, Seymour, Cypress, Whistler滑雪學校訓練員
北海道CASI Course統籌
CASI Hokkaido
Coach Pan
pan 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2011-04-20, 11:48   #6
mchou83
初級會員
 
mchou83 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2011-04-20
住址: HKG/Canada
文章: 1
mchou83 是普普通通的會員
good post
level 3 有D唔同
mchou83 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2011-04-28, 07:24   #7
B2L2
進階會員
 
B2L2 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-05-21
住址: Vancouver, BC, Canada
文章: 401
B2L2 是普普通通的會員
Congratulations to Pan. Saw it from Ader's message that Pan is now a CASI 4. Congratulations.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
回覆

書籤

主題工具
顯示模式

發文規則
不可以發表新主題
不可以發表回覆
不可以上傳附件
不可以編輯自己的文章

啟用 BB 代碼
論壇啟用 表情符號
論壇啟用 [IMG] 代碼
論壇禁用 HTML 代碼
論壇跳轉


所有時間均為香港時間。現在的時間是 23:32

Hong Kong Snowboard & Ski Association
Copyright © 2003 - 2018